Sowing Seeds and Reaping Chaos
In my last piece I discussed broadly how peoples and cultures came to be and touched briefly on the God given mechanism for keeping the peoples separate by bringing a people together. The only thing left to discuss is what some of the real options are available for mediating between people groups. We live in a world where resources are scarce and hard to obtain. People have hard limitations physically, mentally and psychologically (both individually and collectively). As such when different peoples bump into each other there will be conflict, irreconcilable differences and animosity (in many cases justifiably so). This must be dealt with in some way in order for a people to survive and optimally to thrive. To cover this topic I am going to discuss it in terms of mixture and purity.
There is always a risk when talking about mixture and purity with relation to people. This immediately conjures up a whole host of images and themes, most of them are extreme negative examples that need to be looked at, but not initially. To short circuit unproductive thinking we should distill purity and mixture down to their essences; exclusion and inclusion respectively. These concepts should also be viewed in the context of the integrity of a thing or entity. When looked at in this way we can see how there is more of a give and take between these two concepts than that either of them is acting as a fixed state. The examples I could give are endless but to put it into basic terms purity seeks to preserve and mixture seeks to change. One is (typically) passive, the other is (typically) active. Taking a look at words that have the root “fect” (to make/do) really helps to flesh out this dynamic. It is easy to see how this interplay could be beneficial, benign or destructive depending on many factors. Scripture covers this topic through the contrast of extremes. One recurring theme being the contrast between the whore and the bride/mother/virgin. This is found in Proverbs (wisdom and folly), Revelation (the Whore Babylon and the woman clothed with the sun) and the Gospels (Mary the mother of Jesus and Mary Magdalene). I will come back to this but I think that this is enough to move back to the primary topic of the challenges associated with how peoples interact with one another.
Previously I gave an overview of the basic modes of hospitality from least intimate to most intimate: indiscriminate exclusion, discriminate inclusion, discriminate exclusion and indiscriminate inclusion. These different modes are utilized to facilitate healthy dynamics between individuals and between groups who have an implicit respect for one another. They provide a way to mediate differences without letting differences undermine or corrupt the integrity of either party. In other words the purpose of hospitality is to regulate purity. At times it prevents mixture at other times it encourages it. The degree to which any given nation can tolerate the influence of mixture and still maintain its integrity is almost entirely dependent on the capacity of its culture which is both genetically and socially inherited. In order to understand this, thinking in layers is useful.
At the core of every person and nation is lineage, a blood connection. The layer outside of that is personality which is a product of environment acting on genetics. Outside of personality is culture which is a product of collective personality acting on environment. Outside of culture is the geographical environment itself which acts on the people and is acted upon by the people. Environment also acts as a primary buffer between nations. The way that I have these various layers organized isn’t necessarily the most accurate way to do so but it helps to demonstrate that the things closer to the core (the center if you will) are more essential to the person or nation and the things further away are more incidental. Nevertheless they all interact with one another and to change any part is to affect the integrity of the entity for better or worse. If the integrity is affected long enough or dramatically enough, change in the people at the genetic level will occur.
This occurs on its own most of the time as the environment changes (and is changed) or when peoples move around; but it also occurs from the influence of other people and nations. It follows then, that knowledge of and respect for the culture of foreign nations, even ones that are very similar, is essential for any sort of long term diplomacy to occur or civility to exist. The traits necessary for this level of interaction are not common. The individuals who can effectively navigate differences between peoples are rare indeed. These people are at the extreme edges of personality and as such become liminal creatures of sorts, able to navigate between two worlds. This is why we know the names of explorers such as Ferdinand Magellan, traveling merchants such as Marco Polo and naturalists such as Charles Darwin. Of course if you know anything about these types of people, you will recognize something similar about them (but more on that later). The other side of this is that respect and understanding doesn’t automatically equate to peace.
The degree to which two nations have compatible cultures, based around inherited biological limitations, is the degree to which peoples can voluntarily tolerate one another peacefully and furthermore determines the physical distance between them required for peace without employing force. To put this into familiar terms, the capacity for hospitality is in direct proportion to the dog-headedness of one’s neighbors. The reason for this is fairly obvious; better safe than sorry. The quickness with which legitimate animosity can occur between people is shocking, even more-so the quickness with which violence can follow. There are many historical examples of this ranging from the relative homogeneity of Europe to the more chaotic regions of the world where foreigners were (and still are) smashed together such as The Balkans, Africa, The Americas, and The Levant. Ethnic conflict encompasses the majority of human history both recorded and unrecorded when people get too close for comfort, or need to acquire/safeguard resources. Either nations are allowed to maintain their integrity on their terms in their own lands or that integrity is enforced in a shared land through policing of cultural boundaries.
This can be seen especially in America the great “melting pot”. The supposed reforms of the civil rights movement, that everyone apparently wanted, had to be enforced at the point of a gun. People who had been arguably thriving next to each other were being politically forced together and kept together by force. This sort of forced integration is typically seen being employed by conquerors over conquered and is typically followed by ethnic erasure through systematic integration (deracination) and forced genetic assimilation (prima nocta for the Braveheart fans). The historical norm outside of this has been ethnic and cultural homogeneity, with small tight knit groups composed of extended family and who also were related to those in neighboring villages. The only peaceful interactions with foreigners would have been through contact with merchants from other cultures or perhaps small groups of loyalist transplants that lived quiet lives on the literal edges of society and even these sorts of arrangements would have been very rare and perhaps limited only to cities.
As with all rules there are exceptions and when people groups come into contact with one another there is bound to be mixture sometimes voluntary but mostly involuntary as described above. In my previous installment about dog-headed men I mentioned that their women were nearly always described as beautiful. So when conflict arose between peoples and the women of the conquered were left in the aftermath, the natural thing was for them to be taken as wives for the conquerors. The Vikings were probably the most famous for this practice and Judges 21 has an interesting account that is worth reviewing as well. A popular counter example from scripture is God’s warning to the Israelites to not take wives from the Canaanites (an attempt to prevent a repeat of Genesis 6 in my estimation). The understanding here is that a little leaven leavens the whole lump and what is mixed can’t be unmixed. For peoples who are very similar to begin with, this is arguably trivial but when the peoples are very dissimilar it leads to immediate alienation for the offspring of those unions. In our modern edgeworld where people have been pushed together for the better part of 500 years, the opportunity to “colonize” and be “colonized” by the dog-headed has been given plenty of space to occur. Don’t forget though that although these couplings may be voluntary they still have the destructive potential of an improper mixing. Even in a situation where everyone is “mixed” (this is never the case btw) there will be a high degree of conflict because of the immediate alienation that comes from not having a clear heritage. Not many people are equipped to start from scratch in that regard (remember the explorers and the like), people just aren’t typically wired that way. The only way out of that situation is 3-4 generations of concerted effort to homogenize genetically (so there is no visible differentiation), which as you can imagine is difficult when there is conflict and although dog-headed attraction exists, it does have hard limits as well. In the edgeland, there are people who don’t belong anywhere because they have been cut off from the past and the only path forward into the futures one of conflict. When this happens incidentally there is a chance that a new nation can be formed if a critical mass is achieved to form a cohesive center. When this happens by design, you have an existential crisis the likes of which the world has not seen since the Flood and Babel. This brings to the fore the major issue I’ve been building up to since the start of this series.
Before I jump in though, I want to go back briefly to the Biblical examples of the contrast between mixture and purity to help flesh things out. Scripture astutely uses the extreme examples of the whore and the wife/mother to highlight the conflict between mixture and purity respectively. It is not terribly intuitive what is happening there but it boils down to seed. A seed is potential. When planted the seed is mixed with the soil. The seed and soil both die so to speak and something new is born. The whore is emblematic of wasted seed which is cast into infertile chaos. The wife is emblematic of fertile soil from which comes a 100x yield of generations.
Herein lies the counterintuitive relationship between mixture and purity. When brought together in the correct way there is an irreversible change for the sake of future life. To put it another way when a seed is planted it, is the establishment of a new center, the old passes away and gives way to the new. The story of the bronze serpent and its fulfillment in the crucifixion are examples of purity being achieved after corruption through an inversion of the corrupting influence. Life through death so to speak. There is also a further exploration of this in the story of Jonah wherein Jonah is planted and Nineveh grows. The fulfillment of this in the burial and resurrection of Christ is the ultimate example of a seed being planted and then bringing about new life. This is also reflected in the sacraments of Baptism and the Lord’s Supper and the doctrines comparing faith to a seed.
I could spend pages citing examples from Scripture to reinforce this but I don’t need to because we have the perennial tangible example of the union between husband and wife. It is the nearly perfect example of appropriate violation of purity with mixture (the perfect example is of course the relationship between Christ and the Church). The virgin spouses leave their families and become one. They cease to be and yet have a continuation in their children and their nation. With the nation there isn’t just a physical heritage passed on but a cultural one, including a spiritual inheritance in which the offspring will be immersed. Go re-read Acts 17:22 and following really quickly and come back. Can you see where I am going with all this yet? Let me spell it out just so there is no ambiguity. The primary assault on The West right now is an assault on everything White, the people and the culture, which includes Christianity. The attack has been one of inducing Whites everywhere to waste their seed (potential) on chaos instead of planting seeds for the future of their people. They have been enticed away from the Christian faith with mammon and are on the verge of losing every shred of their earthly heritage. This has been done in part by introducing a new religion of anti-purity (there’s the whore again) and along with it historically unprecedented levels of diversity and mixture into The West. This is a major driver of the chaos we see around us. This is also no mere worldly event but rather part of the greater spiritual battle being waged by Satan on Christendom. You see, due to the unique explorative and open nature of the European nations, they have been responsible for the largest spread of Christendom and by extension civilization in history. I dare say that no other people was equipped to do what Europeans did. This is fundamentally why there is a full frontal assault on Whiteness. To snuff out Whiteness is to essentially snuff out Christendom. These are the stakes. This is why this matters.
I‘m what you might call a racist. Not one of those people who irrationally hates others based on their heritage, no that’s not me. I just don’t want my people to continue to be harmed to the point of being erased. I would like to know that my great-grandchildren will have not just an earthly heritage but a heavenly one as well. Don’t worry though if you like The West and Christendom and want your grandchildren to have an unambiguous connection to your forefathers, you are racist too. Get used to it. Embrace it. To understand what this means is to understand what our overlords fear: strong and cohesive families, communities and nations. Like it or not, if you are White or just act White or just like White things (basically anything vaguely civilized) you are under attack, so start behaving like it. In America since the 1960’s there have been regular outbreaks of ethnic violence and domestic terrorism to go along with it, arguably to gain political leverage to advance a multicultural (i.e. anti-White) agenda.
The most recent round of ethnic violence in the 2010’s was sparked due to anti-White (culture) rhetoric under the leadership of our first Black president, let the reader understand. Suffice it to say, if you have been paying attention, this campaign hasn’t ever let up and has transitioned into open anti-White animus. The rhetoric is now nearly at the level of that played on Radio Rwanda in the time before the 100 day genocide of 1994. The rhetoric is approaching that used in South Africa by the ruling class to incite violence against the Boers in an attempt to terrorize them into extinction. To put this into its full perspective, in the history of the world when people who do not like each other are forced into proximity without any enforcement of civility, there is ethnic warfare in proportion to the amount of people from different races living on top of each other. The West has seen an unprecedented invasion of people in the last 60 years. In terms of sheer magnitude there has not been this much mixing of people ever in the history of the world. Things are bleak and they promise to get much worse before they get better.
I could take some time now to lay out some of my pet solutions for things or take some time to shoot down typical Christian objections to the things I’ve laid out but I don’t see the point really. I’ve distilled down years of learning and study into a few poorly written pages. The work of a humble midwit trying to pull off a genius level feat, and it is all I can reasonably do. My hope is that my words here will be a starting point for anyone who has read them. Investigate what I have written and do what you think is best with this information. I recommend getting out of cities and being around as many people who look and think like you as possible. I will also leave the reader with this thought: if White people do not start to become “racist” then there will not be a civilization within which to worry about being “racist”. This doesn’t mean hating anyone but rather loving everyone enough to see that the best thing for all people is to have their own place with enough space to exist as their unique branch of humanity. Not so that they can live their best life and go to Hell but rather so that they may seek God and perhaps find Him though He is not far from any of us.
Make no mistake my friends, we are in a land at the edge of the world, the end of an age, an in-between shadowy place where chaos abounds, and monsters dwell. In this strange and uninhabitable place, the stakes are high, and the days are evil. Our civilization is on the brink of destruction, yet with the end of a thing something new can come forth, if God wills it.
That’s it. That’s all I have to say. Thank you for reading and I pray you will take my words to heart.
Until we meet again.
~Unbiasedmike
 | A guest post by
|